Rethinking Discrimination in Christian Fellowship: Theological Implications of James 2:1–13 for Gen Z

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53547/9bdc9n16

Keywords:

Christian fellowship, discrimination, ecclesial belonging, gen z, James 2:1-13

Abstract

This article examines the theological implications of discrimination in Christian fellowship through an exegetical reading of James 2:1–13 in relation to the Gen Z community. Using a qualitative approach grounded in historical-critical exegesis and theological literature analysis, this study argues that James’s prohibition of partiality is not merely a moral warning against social inequality, but a theological critique of communal practices that contradict faith in Jesus Christ, the royal law of love, and the community’s accountability before divine judgment. The analysis shows that the rich-poor contrast in James 2:1–13 functions as a concrete case through which the text exposes a broader ecclesial disorder, namely the tendency to assign differential worth according to outward status and visibility. In dialogue with practical-theological studies on Gen Z, the article further argues that the passage remains highly relevant in a context where younger generations evaluate Christian communities through justice, authenticity, participation, and belonging. This study contributes an integrative theological framework that connects biblical exegesis, discrimination in Christian fellowship, and the practical-theological horizon of Gen Z, while proposing James 2:1–13 as a normative resource for evaluating ecclesial belonging in contemporary church life.

Abstrak

Artikel ini mengkaji implikasi teologis diskriminasi dalam persekutuan Kristen melalui pembacaan eksegetis Yakobus 2:1–13 dalam kaitannya dengan komunitas Generasi Z. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang berlandaskan eksegesis historis-kritis dan analisis literatur teologis, kajian ini berargumen bahwa larangan Yakobus terhadap keberpihakan bukan sekadar peringatan moral terhadap ketimpangan sosial, melainkan kritik teologis terhadap praktik komunal yang bertentangan dengan iman kepada Yesus Kristus, hukum kerajaan tentang kasih, dan pertanggungjawaban komunitas di hadapan penghakiman ilahi. Analisis ini menunjukkan bahwa kontras kaya-miskin dalam Yakobus 2:1–13 berfungsi sebagai kasus konkret yang melaluinya teks tersebut menyingkapkan kekacauan eklesial yang lebih luas, yakni kecenderungan untuk menetapkan nilai yang berbeda berdasarkan status dan penampilan lahiriah. Dalam dialog dengan kajian teologi praktis tentang Generasi Z, artikel ini selanjutnya berargumen bahwa perikop tersebut tetap sangat relevan dalam konteks ketika generasi muda menilai komunitas Kristen melalui keadilan, autentisitas, partisipasi, dan rasa keberterimaan. Kajian ini menyumbangkan kerangka teologis integratif yang menghubungkan eksegesis biblika, diskriminasi dalam persekutuan Kristen, dan horizon teologis-praktis Generasi Z, sekaligus mengusulkan Yakobus 2:1–13 sebagai sumber normatif untuk mengevaluasi keberterimaan eklesial dalam kehidupan gereja masa kini.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Joko Priyono, Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Injili Indonesia Samarinda, Indonesia

     

     

References

Barnes, Jonathan S. “A Word about . . . Belonging and the Continuing Struggle for Justice.” Review & Expositor 119, no. 3–4 (November 26, 2022): 197–204. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00346373231161597.

Brown, Jeannine K. “James 2:1–13.” Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 62, no. 2 (April 1, 2008): 174–176. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002096430806200208.

Chia, Philip Suciadi. “The ‘Faith’ Problem in James 2.” Theological Journal Kerugma 7, no. 1 (April 25, 2024): 34–49. https://jurnal.sttii-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/kerugma/article/view/373.

Davids, Peter. The Epistle of James: A Commentary on the Greek Text (New International Greek Testament Commentary). New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1982.

Droege, Michael W., and Malan Nel. “Inclusivity in Youth Ministry Praxis and the Challenge of Mainline Church Attrition.” Verbum et Ecclesia 45, no. 1 (June 4, 2024): 1–9. https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/3016.

Fox, Jonathan, and Ariel Zellman. “The Utility of Discrimination: Religious Discrimination and Governmental Legitimacy in Christian-Majority Countries.” European Political Science Review 17, no. 3 (August 22, 2025): 496–513.

Halawa, Jonius, and Abad Jaya Zega. “Yakobus 2: 1-13: Meninjau Pentingnya Kasih Tanpa Memandang Muka.” Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pendidikan Agama 2, no. 1 (2024): 43–50.

Johannes P. Louw and Eugene A. Nida. Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: Based on Semantic Domains. 2nd ed. New York: United Bible Societies, 1989.

Johnson, Luke Timothy. The Letter of James: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, The Anchor Yale Bible. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001.

Kline, David. Racism and the Weakness of Christian Identity. Routledge, 2020. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429591570.

Landová, Tabita. “What Does Generation Z Believe? The Religiosity and Spirituality of Contemporary Czech Youth in Practical-Theological Reflection.” Journal of Youth and Theology 22, no. 2 (September 5, 2022): 226–250. https://brill.com/view/journals/jyt/22/2/article-p226_005.xml.

Maddox, Tanita Tualla. “Chrysostom and Generation Z: Resilience, Identity, and Social Justice.” Journal of Youth and Theology 23, no. 2 (May 26, 2023): 209–230. https://brill.com/view/journals/jyt/23/2/article-p209_005.xml.

Moo, Douglas J. The Letter of James. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000.

Nestle-Aland. Novum Testamentum Graece. Edited by Barbara Aland, Kurt Aland, Johannes Karavidopoulos, Carlo M. Martini, and Bruce M. Metzger. Revised Ed. Stuttgart Alle Rechte vorbehalten: Institute for New Testament Textual Research, 2012.

Pew Research Center. “Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins.” Pew Research Center, January 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/.

Ruzer, Serge. “James on Faith and Righteousness in the Context of a Broader Jewish Exegetical Discourse.” In New Approaches to the Study of Biblical Interpretation in Judaism of the Second Temple Period and in Early Christianity, 79–104. BRILL, 2013. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789004245006/B9789004245006_006.xml.

Senger, Savannah, and Veola E. Vazquez. “Religious Experiences, Expectations of Discrimination, and Distress Among Biracial Christians.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 52, no. 4 (December 14, 2024): 379–394. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00916471241231914.

Sianipar, Desi, Wellem Sairwona, Johanes Waldes Hasugian, Nova Ritonga, and Yunardi Kristian Zega. “Teaching Anti-Discrimination Attitudes through Christian Religious Education in School.” International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies 3, no. 4 (August 30, 2021): 275–279. https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/ijevs/article/view/4101.

Watson, Duane F. “James 2 in Light of Greco-Roman Schemes of Argumentation.” New Testament Studies 39, no. 1 (1993): 94–121.

Wesley Hiram Wachob. The Voice of Jesus in the Social Rhetoric of James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Winarjo, Hendra. “Jesus Christ as The Embodiment of the Wisdom of God: A Theological Commentary on James 3:13-18.” Veritas: Jurnal Teologi dan Pelayanan 22, no. 2 (December 2, 2023): 303–319. https://ojs.seabs.ac.id/index.php/Veritas/article/view/539.

Downloads

Published

06/25/2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rethinking Discrimination in Christian Fellowship: Theological Implications of James 2:1–13 for Gen Z. (2026). DIEGESIS: Jurnal Teologi Kharismatika, 9(1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.53547/9bdc9n16

Similar Articles

21-30 of 57

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.