A Hermeneutical-Theological Analysis of the Nephilim in Genesis 6:4: A Pentecostal Systematic Theology Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53547/e1m70j56Keywords:
bene Ha'elohim, Genesis 6:4, Nephilim, pentecostal hermeneutics, pentecostal systematic theologyAbstract
The Nephilim have long been a controversial topic in biblical theology and can give rise to conflict due to differing interpretations across various denominations, which in turn can weaken the unity of the body of Christ. One interpretation holds that the Nephilim were giants resulting from relations between human and spiritual beings, while another view argues that the Nephilim were simply large humans with no connection to spiritual entities. The question is whether Pentecostal believers, as part of the body of Christ, can respond more wisely to the existing differences in interpretation and discover alternative interpretations by using qualitative research methods, literature review, and exposition of biblical texts through a hermeneutical-theological study with a Pentecostal systematic approach? This study is limited to understand the Nephilim according to what is written in the canonical Indonesian Bible (Terjemahan Baru by Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia TB-LAI), without relying on conclusions drawn from apocryphal writings. The urgency of this research lies in its effort to offer a Pentecostal systematic approach to Nephilim theology, highlighting the root cause of humanity’s fall as rebellion against God and the restoration of the church through the work of the Holy Spirit, who guides and leads the new men to live as sons of God. The results of this study demonstrate that the Bible, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, is capable of providing answers to the theology of the Nephilim and adequately explaining the identity of the sons of God in a way that supports the growth of Pentecostal believers’ faith in the dynamics of the modern era.
Abstrak
Nevilim telah lama menjadi topik yang kontroversial dalam teologi biblika dan dapat menimbulkan pertentangan karena perbedaan penafsiran dari berbagai denominasi, yang ujungnya dapat melemahkan persatuan kesatuan tubuh Kristus. Ada penafsiran mengatakan Nevilim adalah makhluk raksasa dikarenakan hubungan antara anak-anak manusia dengan makhluk roh, dan ada juga penafsiran bahwa Nevilim hanyalah anak-anak manusia berbadan raksasa yang tidak ada hubungannya dengan makhluk roh. Pertanyaannya apakah insan Pentakosta yang adalah bagian dari tubuh Kristus dapat menyikapi perbedaan penafsiran yang ada dengan lebih bijak dan menemukan penafsiran alternatif dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif tinjauan pustaka dan eksposisi teks-teks Alkitab melalui kajian hermeneutis-teologis dengan pendekatan sistematika Pentakosta? Penelitian ini dibatasi pada pemahaman Nevilim menurut Alkitab kanon standar Terjemahan Baru yang diterbitkan Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia (TB-LAI), tanpa perlu bergantung pada hasil akhir dari tulisan-tulisan apokrifa. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada upaya menawarkan respons pendekatan Sistematika Pentakosta terhadap teologi Nevilim yang menyoroti akar penyebab kejatuhan manusia sebagai pemberontakan manusia terhadap Allah dan pemulihan gereja melalui karya Roh Kudus yang membimbing, memimpin manusia baru untuk hidup sebagai anak-anak Allah. Hasil dari penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa Alkitab dengan tuntunan Roh Kudus mampu memberikan jawaban akan teologi Nevilim dan menjelaskan predikat anak-anak Allah secara memadai untuk mendukung pertumbuhan iman umat Pentakosta dalam dinamika zaman modern ini.
Downloads
References
Abraham, Rubin Adi. “Teologi Keselamatan.” Bethany Church Singapore.
Archer, Kenneth. A. Pentecostal Hermeneutic for the Twenty First Century: Spirit, Scripture and Community. London: T&T Clark, 2004.
Brand, Miryam. “The Benei Elohim, the Watchers, and the Origins of Evil - TheTorah.Com.” The Torah.
Gulo, Rezeki Putra. “Kajian Teologis Frasa Anak-Anak Allah Dan Anak-Anak Manusia Dalam Narasi Kejadian 6:1-4.” Academia (2022): 1–13.
Haiser, Michael S. The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible. Edited by David Lambert. Lexham Press. 1st ed. Vol. 59. Bellingham, WA 98225: Lexham Press, 2015.
Heiser, Michael S. “Are Yahweh and El Distinct Deities in Deuteronomy 32:8–9 and Psalm 82” HIPHIL Nov (2006): 1–24.
Heiser, Michael S, Hebrew Bible, and Ancient Semitic Languages. “The Meaning of the Word Nephilim: Fact vs. Fantasy” (2005).
Hendi, and Tiopan Aruan. “Konsep Manusia Baru Di Dalam Kristus Berdasarkan Surat Efesus 4:17-32.” Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat 4, no. 1 (2020): 113–130.
Hermanto, Suanglangi. “Bahasa Roh : Apa Dan Bagaimana?” Jurnal Jaffray 2, no. 1 (2004): 17–25.
Hina, Jefri, and Remi Katu. “Hermeneutika Teologi Pentakosta.” Jurnal Teologi Amreta Volume 1, No. 2 April 2018 1, no. 2 (2018): 7–10.
Kevin, Ray Tonny. “Konsep Yesus Anak Allah: Suatu Apologetika Terhadap Pandangan ‘Allah Tidak Beranak Dan Tidak Diperanakkan.’” Antusias Jurnal Teologi Dan Pelayanan 2, no. 3 (2013): 1–36.
Kriswanto, Agus. “Melampaui Eksegesis Dan Eisegesis: Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Hermeneutika Teologi Pembebasan.” IMMANUEL: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen 1, no. 2 (2020): 52–62.
Marisi, Candra Gunawan. Manusia Seutuhnya; Esensi Kemanusiaan Dalam Perspektif Kelahiran Baru. Batam: Yayasan Yuta Pendidikan Cerdas, 2024.
Martin, Lee Roy. Pentecostal Hermeneutics : A Reader. Edited by Lee Roy Martin. Digital. Leiden: Brill, 2013.
Muddamalle, Joel. The Unseen Battle. E-Pub Edit. Zondervan Reflective, 2025.
Natalia, Christine. “Studi Eksegesis Mengenai Identitas Anak-Anak Allah Dalam Teks Kejadian 6:1-4.” SEKOLAH TINGGI TEOLOGI SATYABHAKTI MALANG, 2013.
Nel, Marius. “Defining Elements and Challenges of a Pentecostal Hermeneutics of Experience." 77, No. 2 (2021): 1-7.” HTS Theological Studies 77, no. 2 (2021): 1–7.
Oliverio Jr, L. William. “An Interpretive Review Essay on Amos Yong’s Spirit-Word-Community: Theological Hermeneutics in Trinitarian Perspective.” Journal of Pentecostal Theology 18, no. 2 (2009): 301–311.
Otto Otto, Oky. “Mitologi Anak-Anak Allah Di Dalam Kejadian 6:2.” Jurnal Teologi Biblika 5, no. 1 (2020): 24–35.
Parandan, Ronal, and Yohanes T. Rompon. “Kajian Teologis Terhadap Istilah ‘Anak-Anak Allah’ Dan ‘Anak-Anak Manusia’ Berdasarkan Kejadian 6:1-3.” PROTOS Journal of Theology and Christian Education 2, no. 1 (2026): 11–20.
Roberts, Scott Alan. The Rise and Fall of the Nephilim: The Untold Story of Fallen Angels, Giants on the Earth, and Their Extraterrestrial Origins. Digital. New Page, 2025.
Routledge, Robin. “The Nephilim: A Tall Story?: Who Were the Nephilim and How Did They Survive the Flood?” Tyndale Bulletin 66, no. 1 (2015): 19–40.
Septianingrum, Anisa. Sejarah Peradaban Dunia Kuno Empat Benua. Edited by Nurti Lestari. Yogyakarta: Anak Hebat Indonesia, 2017.
Simanjuntak, Fredy, Ardianto Lahagu, Yasanto Lase, and Aprilina Priscilla. “Konsep Dosa Menurut Pandangan Paulus.” Real Didache 3, no. 2 (2018): 17–28.
Sirait, Hikman. Hermeneutika Dasar, Aplikasi Ke Dalam Teks Pilihan. Edited by Afifah Azhaar. First. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Publisher, 2023.
Stefanus, Tay;, and Listiati Ingrid. “Apakah Itu Manusia Raksasa/ Nephilim (Kej 6:4)?” Katolisitas.Org.
Unmack, Edward C. “Why We Reject The Apocrypha.” The Evangelical Quarterly 1, no. 4 (1929): 361–366.
Walton, John H. “The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate.” InterVarsity Press 2 (2010).
Waruwu, Vanny Miracleson, and Dicky Kansil. “Studi Hermeneutik: Problematika Teks Henokh 15:7 Terhadap Penggunaannya Dalam Matius 22:29-30.” Saint Paul’S Review 3, no. 2 (2024): 179–189.
White, Elen. “Who Are the Nephilim? - Biblical Archaeology Society.” Biblical Archaeology Society.
Winter, Jay. The Complete Book of Enoch: Standard English Version. Digital. Winters Publications, 2015.
Yong, Amos. “Spirit-Word-Community: Theological Hermeneutics in Trinitarian Perspective.” Routledge (2017).
“Ayub 1:6 - Tafsiran/Catatan - Alkitab SABDA.” Alkitab Sabda.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rachmat Tony SinjoBantaeng, Candra Gunawan Marisi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Diegesis: Jurnal Teologi Pentakosta Kharismatika are protected by copyright. The copyright is fully retained by the authors, while the journal holds the right to publish and distribute the articles in both print and electronic formats.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This license allows readers to:
- Properly attribute the author(s) and the journal.
- Use the article for non-commercial purposes only.
- Distribute any derivative works under the same license.
For uses beyond the scope of this license—such as commercial purposes or modifications not permitted by the license—users must obtain written permission from the author(s) or the journal publisher. For further information regarding copyright or permission requests, please contact us through the journal's official website or editorial support email.


