Orality Hermeneutics in the Gospel of Mark and the Timorese Natoni Tradition: A Comparative Library-Based Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53547/rewkck28Keywords:
Gospel of Mark, oral culture, comparative library study, natoni, contextual her-meneuticsAbstract
This article examines the dialogue between the oral traditions of the Timorese people and the Gospel of Mark through an oral-based hermeneutical approach, operationalized as a comparative library-based study rather than field ethnography. Primary data consist of the Markan text (Mark 4:1–34 and Mark 8:27–30); secondary data consist of published ethnographic documentation of Timorese oral practices, particularly natoni. Three analytical indicators are used consistently throughout the study: communal memory, speech event, and narrative performativity, synthesized from Walter J. Ong, Werner H. Kelber, James D. G. Dunn, Richard Bauman, Ruth Finnegan, Richard A. Horsley, and Dell Hymes. The analysis shows that both corpora exhibit structurally comparable oral mechanisms (repetition, dialogic address, and performative closure) that sustain memory and shape communal identity, without implying any historical or genealogical connection between them. The article positions its contribution against prior orality scholarship, particularly the volume Performing the Gospel, and argues that its distinct contribution lies in a documentary-comparative model applicable to library-based contextual hermeneutics where field access is constrained. The study concludes with an explicit call for future field-based validation of the proposed model.
Abstrak
Artikel ini mengkaji dialog antara tradisi lisan masyarakat Timor dan kesaksian Injil Markus melalui pendekatan hermeneutika berbasis orality, yang secara metodologis dioperasionalkan sebagai studi pustaka komparatif, bukan penelitian lapangan (etnografi partisipatoris). Data primer berupa teks Markus (Markus 4:1-34 dan Markus 8:27-30); data sekunder berupa dokumentasi etnografis terpublikasi mengenai praktik tutur masyarakat Timor, khususnya natoni. Penelitian menggunakan tiga indikator analisis secara konsisten di sepanjang naskah, yaitu memori komunal, peristiwa tutur (speech event), dan performativitas narasi, yang disintesiskan dari pemikiran Walter J. Ong, Werner H. Kelber, James D. G. Dunn, Richard Bauman, Ruth Finnegan, Richard A. Horsley, dan Dell Hymes. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa kedua korpus memperlihatkan mekanisme oral yang secara struktural dapat diperbandingkan (repetisi, sapaan dialogis, dan penutup performatif) yang berfungsi memelihara memori dan membentuk identitas komunal, tanpa mengandaikan hubungan historis maupun genealogis di antara keduanya. Artikel ini memosisikan kontribusinya berhadapan dengan kajian oralitas terdahulu, terutama volume Performing the Gospel, dan berargumen bahwa kebaruannya terletak pada model dokumenter-komparatif yang dapat diterapkan dalam hermeneutika kontekstual berbasis pustaka ketika akses lapangan tidak tersedia. Penelitian ini ditutup dengan seruan eksplisit bagi validasi lapangan pada penelitian lanjutan.
Downloads
References
Ande, Andreas, and Supianto. “Reducing Conflict Based on History Education and Oral Traditions of Atoin Pah Meto in West Timor.” Historical Encounters 12, no. 1 (2025): 50–56.
Batten, A. “Book Review: Performing the Gospel: Orality, Memory, and Mark. Essays Dedicated to Werner Kelber. Edited by Richard A. Horsley, Jonathan A. Draper. & John Miles Foley. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2006.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 39 (2009): 44–45.
Bauman, Richard. “Verbal Art as Performance.” American Anthropologist 77, no. 2 (1975): 290–311.
Bowen, Glenn A. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9, no. 2 (2009): 27–40.
Creswell, John W., and Cheryl N. Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 5th ed. California: SAGE Publications, 2023.
Denzin, Norman K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 2nd ed. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Dunn, James D. G. “Altering the Default Setting: Re-Envisaging the Early Transmission of the Jesus Tradition.” New Testament Studies 49, no. 2 (April 7, 2003): 139–175. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0028688503000080/type/journal_article.
———. “Eyewitnesses and the Oral Jesus Tradition.” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 6 (2008): 85–105.
———. Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, Volume 1. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2003.
Fallo, John Darwis, and Fathur Rokhman. “Tuturan Ritual Natoni Adat Masyarakat Etnis Timor Dalam Penyambutan Tamu Di Sekolah.” Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia 5 (2016): 105–114.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Revised ed. London: A&C Black, 2013.
Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information & Libraries Journal 26, no. 2 (June 27, 2009): 91–108. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
Grossman, Elwira M. “Blaski i Cienie Globalizacji , Czyli Problemy Polonistyki w Badaniach Komparatystycznych .” Centrum Humanistyki Cyfrowei 6 (2009): 66–78.
Horsley, Richard A. “Can Study of the Historical Jesus Escape Its Typographical Captivity?” Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 19, no. 3 (2021): 265–329.
———. “Jesus and the Powers: Conflict, Covenant, and the Hope of the Poor” (2010).
Hymes, Dell. “Models Of The Interaction of Language and Social Life.” Etnographic Description and Explanation (1972).
Iverson, Kelly R. “Performing Early Christian Literature: Audience Experience and Interpretation of the Gospels.” Performing Early Christian Literature: Audience Experience and Interpretation of the Gospels (2021): 1–230.
Kelber, Werner H. The Oral and the Written Gospel : The Hermeneutics of Speaking and Writing in the Synoptic Tradition, Mark, Paul, and QNo Title. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1983.
Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. Qualitative Research. Singapore: Mc. Graw Hill Book Co., 1985.
Lincoln, Yvonne S., S. Lyhnam, and E. Guba. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 213–263. 5th ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2018.
Nazarudin. “Oral Literature, Gender, and Precedence in East Timor: Metaphysics in Narrative , by David Hicks.” Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia (2023).
Nestle, Eberhard, Barbara Aland, Kurt Aland, and Holger Strutwolf. Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th ed. Mohringen, Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012.
Ong, Walter J. “Literacy and Orality in Our Times.” Journal of Communication 30, no. 1 (1980): 197–204.
Pasaribu, Ferdinan, and Benget Parningotan. “Mengatasi Gap Generasi Dalam Komunikasi Kristen: Pendekatan Yang Relevan Dan Kontekstual.” REAL DIDACHE: Journal of Christian Education 5, no. 1 (March 30, 2025): 81–95. https://ojs.sttrealbatam.ac.id/index.php/didache/article/view/639.
Patton, Michael Quinn. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Edited by C. Deborah Laughton. Evaluation Journal of Australasia. 3rd ed. California: SAGE Publication, 2002.
Purnama, Jellia Puspa, and Yanto Paulus Hermanto. “Model Transformasi Terhadap Budaya Sunda Cageur, Bageur, Bener, Pinter Jeung Singer.” DIEGESIS: Jurnal Teologi Kharismatika 7, no. 1 (June 27, 2024): 71–85. https://ojs.sttrealbatam.ac.id/index.php/diegesis/article/view/460.
Ricoeur, Paul. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences: Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation. Edited by John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Rodríguez, Rafael. “Text as Tradition - Tradition as Text Early Christian Memory and Jesus’ Threat against the Temple.” Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift 19, no. 2 (2023): 115–133.
Simangunsong, Marulam, and Joni Manumpak Parulian Gultom. “Kajian Teologis Tentang Pembedaan Gender Dan Hak Waris Suku Batak Toba Serta Implikasinya Di Perantauan.” DIEGESIS: Jurnal Teologi Kharismatika 7, no. 2 (December 16, 2024): 184–202. https://ojs.sttrealbatam.ac.id/index.php/diegesis/article/view/624.
Simanjuntak, Fredy, Russ Perry, Matius Lim, Timotius Mangiring Tua Togatorop, and Daniel Robert Tangkere. “Church-Centric Bible Translation as a Model of Community Service in Seaman Communities.” Real Coster : Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat 9, no. 1 (March 27, 2026): 1–19. https://ojs.sttrealbatam.ac.id/index.php/coster/article/view/724.
Snyder, Hannah. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104 (November 2019): 333–339. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0148296319304564.
Tarzia, Fabio. “The Origins of Christianity Between Orality, Writing, and Images: A Mediological Analysis.” Religions 16, no. 5 (2025).
Thu, Pyone Myat. “Journeys to Knua: Displacement, Return and Translocality in Timor-Leste.” Mobilities 15 (2020): 527–542.
Tulus, Jekson, and Sang Putra Immanuel Duha. “Analisis Teks Yosua 1:8 Terhadap Memori Dan Aplikasinya Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Remaja Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Glugur, Medan.” REAL DIDACHE: Journal of Christian Education 4, no. 2 (September 30, 2024): 129–144. https://ojs.sttrealbatam.ac.id/index.php/didache/article/view/540.
Walsh, Richard. “Performing the Gospel: Orality, Memory, and Mark: Essays Dedicated to Werner Kelber – Edited by Richard A. Horsley, Jonathan A. Draper, and John Miles Foley.” Religious Studies Review 32 (2006): 198.
Wheatley, Paul D. “The Ritual Bridge between Narrative and Performance in the Gospel of Mark.” Religions 14, no. 9 (2023).
Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research Design and Methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publication, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yanjumseby Yeverson Manafe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Diegesis: Jurnal Teologi Pentakosta Kharismatika are protected by copyright. The copyright is fully retained by the authors, while the journal holds the right to publish and distribute the articles in both print and electronic formats.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This license allows readers to:
- Properly attribute the author(s) and the journal.
- Use the article for non-commercial purposes only.
- Distribute any derivative works under the same license.
For uses beyond the scope of this license—such as commercial purposes or modifications not permitted by the license—users must obtain written permission from the author(s) or the journal publisher. For further information regarding copyright or permission requests, please contact us through the journal's official website or editorial support email.
